Public Opinion, The “No Viral, No Justice” Phenomenon, and Its Impact on the Vina Cirebon Case

Mukhammad Sahlan

doi:10.55927/ijar.v5i7.16908

Authors

Mukhammad Sahlan Prodi KPI UIN Sunan Kalijaga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ijar.v5i7.16908

Keywords:

Vina Cirebon, Public Opinion, No Viral No Justice

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the influence of public opinion and the phenomenon of no viral ni justice in handling the legal case of the murder of Vina Cirebon, which went viral and attracted public attention since the release of the film Vina: Before Seven Days. After the film, public pressure arose to reveal the Vina case, which was allegedly full of irregularities. The research method used was qualitative research. The results of this study are that public opinion influenced the re-opening of the Vina Cirebon case, which also gave rise to the phenomenon of no viral, no justice, which also initiated a re-investigation of this case until the Community movement to free her and sue Pegi Setyawan as the main perpetrator, which was later successful. Public opinion in monitoring the Vina Cirebon case has become one of the massive and large movements in law enforcement in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alex Mohammad L. Haqqi. “Analisis Sentimen Twitter (X) Menggunakan Social Network Analysis Terhadap Kasus Pembunuhan Vina Cirebon.” ResearchGate 2, no. 1 (May 2024).

Anindyadevi Aurellia. “Sinopsis Film Vina Sebelum 7 Hari, Kisah Nyata Dan Fakta Terbarunya Baca Artikel Detikjabar, ‘Sinopsis Film Vina Sebelum 7 Hari, Kisah Nyata Dan Fakta Terbarunya.’” Www.Detik.Com, 2024.

Chaterine, Rahel N. “Fenomena “No Viral No Justice", Ini 4 Kasus Yang Baru Ditangani Polisi Setelah Viral Di Medsos.” Kompas.com, 2021.

CNN Indonesia. “Pegi Setiawan Bebas, Ahli Sebut Korban Salah Tangkap Dapat Ganti Rugi .” CNNndonesia, 2024.

Dewi, Erna, Mashuril Anwar, Tri Andrisman, and Budi Rizki Husin. “Reducing the Expenses of Criminal Jurisdictions through Strengthening the Principle of Judgment Based on Local Awareness.” International Journal of Entrepreneurship 25, no. 2 (2021). Djonaesih. S. Sunarjo, loc.cit , hlm. 27.

Elisabet, and Chontina Siahan. “DAMPAK KOMUNIKASI POLITIK DAN OPINI PUBLIK TERHADAP PERILAKU MASYARAKAT.” FisiPublik : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Politik 6, no. 2 (2021).

Emily Doskow, “awal s/d akhir kasus prita vs RS Omni (pencemaran nama baik)”,

Erna Dewi et al., “Reducing the Expenses of Criminal Jurisdictions through Strengthening the Principle of Judgment Based on Local Awareness,” International Journal of Entrepreneurship 25, no. 2 (2021): 1–10.

Evi Safitri, Jokowi Angkat Bicara soal Pembunuhan Vina: Tak Ada yang Perlu Ditutupi"

Fidiyani, Rini, Dewi Sulistianingsih, and Pujiono Pujiono. “LAW AND ETHICS IN SOCIAL MEDIA COMMUNICATION.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 17, no. 3 (2017). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.3.1665.

Firmansyah, Mas Agus, and Dedi Supriyadi. “PELUANG DAN TANTANGAN DALAM MEMETAKAN OPINI PUBLIK DI MEDIA SOSIAL.” Jurnal Kaganga: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial Dan Humaniora 6, no. 1 (2022).

Haq, Hilman Syahrial, Sofyan Wimbo Agung Pradnyawan, M Taufik Rachman, Edi Yanto, Anies Prima Dewi, and Jan Alizea Sybelle. “Legal Reasoning of a Judge’s Dissenting Opinion in the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 1/PUU-VIII/2010 Against the Judicial Review of Law No. 3 of 1997 on Juvenile Courts.” Jurnal Jurisprudence 12, no. 2 (2023).

Hietanen, Mika, and Johan Eddebo. “Towards a Definition of Hate Speech—With a Focus on Online Contexts.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 47, no. 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/01968599221124309.

Johnstone, Gerry. “Restorative Justice and the Culture of Control.” In Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, Vol. 61, 2022.

Khilmiyah, Akif. “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Sistematika Penelitian Kualitatif).” Bantul: Samudra Biru, No. 978-602-6295-10-1 (2016).

Masitah, Anggun Dyah, and Dian Suluh Kusuma Dewi. “Analisis Opini Publik Berdasarkan Teori Agenda Setting.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol 6 No 2, No. Proses Perencanaan Pemindahan IKN (2022).

Monica Octavia, Sanusi, and Alip Rahman, “Restorative Justice in Resolving Embedding at Cirebon City Polres,” JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review 3, no. 1 (2021): 35–44,

Saksi Baru Kasus Vina Cirebon Diperiksa Bareskrim, Yakin Penyebab Kematian karena Kecelakaan, diperiksa-bareskrim-yakin-penyebab-kematian-karena-kecelakaan, 29 Agustus 2024

Saputra, “‘ One Nation Under Virtual Police’: Kontrol Sosial , Aktivisme Viral , Dan Patroli Internet.”

Sri Turatmiyah et al., “The Ineffectiveness of Mediation in Divorce Disputes: A Case Study in the Palembang Religious Court,” Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 55, no. 2 (2022): 351,

Taufik, Cevi Mochamad, and Nana Suryana. “MEDIA STRATEGY IN UPHOLDING THE TRUTH IN POST TRUTH ERA.” Jurnal Komunikasi dan Bisnis 10, no. 2 (2022).

Tim Audit Kasus Vina dan Eky, Mabes Polri disebut telah menjatuhi sanksi kepada polisi yang melanggar SOP.

Wood, Mark, Evelyn Rose, and Chrissy Thompson. “Viral Justice? Online Justice-Seeking, Intimate Partner Violence and Affective Contagion.” Theoretical Criminology 23, no. 3 (2019).